On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 6:37 AM, Manoj Govindassamy <manoj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > (2) We are not comfortable moving to PGPool just for automatic failback mode > on hot-standby failure. Hmm.. my reply might be misleading. What I meant was to use pgpool-II as a clusterware for PostgreSQL built-in replication, not as a replication itself. You can health-check, do failover if necessary and manage the PostgreSQL replication by using pgpool-II. AFAIK pgpool-II has such an operation mode. But you are still not comfortable in using pgpool-II in that way? Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
