Search Postgresql Archives

Re: HA options

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1/16/2012 4:13 PM, Andy Colson wrote:
On 1/16/2012 4:09 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 01/16/12 2:04 PM, Tim Uckun wrote:
I realize that. Eventually we might have to go to physical machines
but for now we are using virtual servers and I have to make it work
within that structure.

quite the catch-22. a single well built dedicated server likely would be
MORE reliable than a cluster of two virtual servers, and a lot less
complicated. C'est la vie.




I wonder. If its a write heavy database, I totally agree with you. But
if its mostly read-only, and mostly fits in ram, then a pgpool of
servers should be faster.

Be nice to know the usage patterns of this database. (and size).

-Andy


crap. ignore me. You used "reliable" and "complicated", and I used "faster". I really should read things more closely.

-Andy

--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux