Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Hope for a new PostgreSQL era?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Sorry for delay,


I wonder if the prioritisation could be done using nice - each backend is a separate process, so why not to do 'nice(10)' for low priority processes or something like that.

Yes, to a limited degree you can prioritise queries using nice and ionice, but it's awkward because:

- All queries run as `postgres' so you can't do per-user limiting very easily

- The postmaster doesn't have a way to set the nice level and ionice level when it forks a backend, nor does the backend have any way to do it later. You can use your own user-defined C functions for this, though.

Postmaster hasn't a way to modify the system nice or ionice, but it can send signals to child process. Sending a user signal to sleep completely the child (i/o and cpu) or before any i/o call can do the trick. Perhaps it's time to add a query scheduler or a more complete/complex one in postgres.

--
Craig Ringer

----------------------------------------------
Si la vida te da la espalda, ¡tocale el culo!


--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux