On Thursday 08 December 2011 18:34:35 Tomas Vondra wrote: > On 8 Prosinec 2011, 18:14, Marc Cousin wrote: > >> > It means you keep your session variables, your prepared > >> > statements, > >> > your running transaction, etc… in each individual session while > >> > having the multiplexing equivalent of a 'statement level' from > >> > pgbouncer. > >> > >> Yes. But if you expect that PostgreSQL will mimic Oracle architecture, > >> then you're mistaken. It's simply a different solution with different > >> architecture, and that means you may need to use different application > >> design sometimes. > > > > I just don't understand what you're getting all heated up for. I don't > > want PostgreSQL to mimic Oracle, and I'm only answering to Simon's > > question at the begining. > > Sorry, I was not arguing with you nor heated up. It's rather a translation > mistake - in my native language we often use 'you' when we actually mean > 'someone.' So it should be something like "If someone expects ... he's > mistaken," etc. Ok, no problem, that just felt weird :) -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
