On 8 Prosinec 2011, 17:56, Merlin Moncure wrote: > regarding the "enterprises won't use community supplied postgresql add > ons" point, this completely true in many cases. I do think pgbouncer > should be seriously considered for advancement as a core feature. That > said, this should be done on its own merits, not to satisfy the > capricious whims of enterprises. I don't think so. In my experience, the enterprises are not using PostgreSQL (or other OS software in genera) because they think there's no guarantee or support available. If there's a third party (might be a local consulting company) providing acceptable guarantees and support for PostgreSQL, it may as well provide guarantees for pgbouncer and the enterprise customer is fine. They simply want a package with guarantees, it does not matter whether it's in core or not. Tomas -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
