On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 9:11 AM, Marc Cousin <cousinmarc@xxxxxxxxx> > > wrote: > > I wish it was the same (I use and like both pgbouncer and pgpool too, > and they do a good job, I'm not arguing on that). But unfortunately it > isn't: you still have the notion of session for each connected client > in Oracle when using the shared servers model. > > It means you keep your session variables, your prepared statements, > your running transaction, etc… in each individual session while having > the multiplexing equivalent of a 'statement level' from pgbouncer. In Oracle - can the pool share connections between DB users and/or databases on the instance? If the answer is yes to either, that is a fair bit better than what we can achieve today. Brad. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general