* Christoph Zwerschke (cito@xxxxxxxxx) wrote: > (Btw, what negative consequences - if any - does it have if I set > kernel.shmmax higher as necessary, like all available memory? Does > this limit serve only as a protection against greedy applications?) Didn't see this get answered... The long-and-short of that there aren't any negative consequences of having it higher, as I understand it anyway, except the risk of greedy apps. In some cases, shared memory can't be swapped out, which makes it a bit more risky than 'regular' memory getting sucked up by some app. Thanks, Stephen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
