Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Behavior of negative OFFSET

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/7/11, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Robert James <srobertjames@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I've been using a query on Postgres 8.4 with a negative OFFSET, which
>> works fine:
>>
>>   SELECT DISTINCT s.* FROM s WHERE ... ORDER BY s.bday ASC, s.name
>> ASC LIMIT 15 OFFSET -15
>>
>
> the original behavior was undefined.

What do it do in reality? I'm debugging a legacy app which used it.

> to kinda sorta get it,
> create function oldoffset(int) returns int as
> $$
>   select case when $1 < 0 then 0 else $1 end;
> $$ language sql immutable;
>
> select v from generate_series(1,15) v limit 15 offset oldoffset(-15);
>

That sounds like if OFFSET was negative, it would be simply ignored.
Is that correct? When was the behavior of OFFSET changed?

Also: Is there any reference in the docs to this? I wasn't able to find this.

-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux