Search Postgresql Archives

Re: OOM Killer / PG9 / RHEL 6.1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 10:42, David Kerr <dmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> just a quick check, is
> vm.overcommit_memory = 2
> vm.swappiness = 0
>
> Still the way to go with PG9.0 / RHEL 6.1 (64bit) ?

IMHO yes (although I never touch swappiness...)

> I know we gained some control over the OOM Killer in newer kernels
> and remember reading that maybe postgres could handle it in a different way now.

If you compile with -DOOM_ADJ (which I think the red hat rpms do?)
yes. As usual the docs are fairly good:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/interactive/kernel-resources.html#LINUX-MEMORY-OVERCOMMIT

-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux