Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Why is there no 8.3.16 rpm with _id ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2011/10/30 Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> [Moving to pgsql-general]
>
> On Sun, 2011-10-30 at 07:24 +0100, hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote:
>> we'd like to upgrade to newest 8.3, and we're on 8.3.11 _id, but it
>> looks like 8.3.11 is the newest version of 8.3 built with integer
>> datetimes:
>> http://yum.postgresql.org/8.3/redhat/rhel-5-x86_64-id/repoview/
>>
>> Is there any reason for this, and will there be any newer versions
>> built with integer datetimes?
>>
> I have no intention to build the -id packages again, given the lack of
> request (first request since 8.3.11...). You can build your own packages
> quite easily, though.
>

Hey Devrim, any chance you have published your rpm spec files you used
on the earlier 8.3 -id builds? I looked around and couldn't find one.


Robert Treat
conjecture: xzilla.net
consulting: omniti.com

-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux