Greg Jaskiewicz <gryzman@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 18 Oct 2011, at 20:17, Tom Lane wrote: >> Hmm. The reason for that is that the table types aren't considered >> dumpable objects. I suppose we need to fix that, but in the meantime >> you'd have better luck if you created the types as composite types >> instead of implicit table rowtypes. > Maybe worth adding to the TODO. If I hadn't done it yesterday, maybe so. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
