Jimmy, What was your question ? The JDBC list is not dead. Dave Cramer dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca http://www.credativ.ca 2011/9/18 Jimmy K. <jimmypgres@xxxxxxxxx>: > Thanks for answer, we will try this driver, because it's more > promising, if we will found some bugs or suggestion, You will be > informed (I assume driver is stage that some ideas may be included > with no problem). > > Btw, when I wanted to download driver from other station, I was saw > Beta 1 driver (and I got 404) - after few refreshes We got Beta 2. > >> Last time we think, about creating complete and >> modern free database system for j2ee platforms. > Good luck! But, I think it's unneeded. Just use apply your patches, > and make release, next day we will test it wit no doubt. If I will > have time, I could support this as well too, just for clear fun. > > Regards, > Jimmy > > 2011/9/16 Radosław Smogura <rsmogura@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >> On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 10:18:46 +0200, Jimmy K. wrote: >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I asked this question on JDBC list, but it seems "dead". >>> >>> I found alternative JDBC driver marked as Beta 2 (actually last time >>> bumped to Beta 2.1) http://softperience.eu/pages/cmn/ngpgjdbc.xhtml. >>> We still test it. Those features are, mainly, in our interest >>> - binary transfer >>> - possibility of loading large bytea in JVM with small heap (we loaded >>> about 1GB in JVM with 256MB) >>> - XA >>> >>> But, I would like to ask, if someone of You have tested it, and / or >>> compared. We actually looking for general opinion if it's suitable for >>> JavaEE + JPA/Hibernate >>> >>> Regards, >>> J. >> >> Hello, >> >> The driver I develop is mainly focused for JavaEE + JPA. We and friendly >> company already, uses it during test and for some "less critical", but live >> systems (in J2EE 6 environment) (during this tests we had found two >> problems, one is fixed, and 2nd looks like comes from PostgreSQL, but it >> will be fixed). >> >> If You ask for performance there is available test of original driver with >> some binary patches >> (http://blogs.oracle.com/jkshah/entry/postgres_8_4_testing_with). >> >> The driver started from our internal interest for making our apps stable >> (statement timeout), and faster (binary protocol), rest of changes came from >> propositions on forum (JDBC4 exceptions, "possibility of loading large bytea >> in JVM with small heap", UDTs). Some of patches was sent for official >> version, but topics "died". We have, as well, different conception, then is >> visible in original driver - we want to remove as much processing as >> possible from database, because app server is clusterizable, and db not. >> >> If you have some ideas or if you found bug, You may contact me or submit >> data through our web side. Last time we think, about creating complete and >> modern free database system for j2ee platforms. >> >> Best regards, >> Radoslaw Smogura >> http://softperience.eu >> > > -- > Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general > -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
