=?ISO-8859-2?Q?pasman_pasma=F1ski?= <pasman.p@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > That's interpretation of subselect is ok, when it contains only stable > functions. > Maybe add a warning when subselect contains volatile function. We're not likely to do that, because this sort of notation is actually fairly commonly used to hide the volatility of non-stable functions. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
