On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 18:44, Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 4:36 AM, Tony Wang <wwwjfy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:They're likely exclusive locks on a transaction, which are normal.
> Weird that I receive your each message twice.
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 15:33, Radoslaw Smogura <rsmogura@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>>
>> Simple and obvious question right now do You call commit after
>> transaction? If yes do you use any query or connection pooler?
>
> Yes. connection pool is used as application level, not db level.
> no commit after transaction is possible (I'm trying to check the logic), I
> just cannot imagine it happened for so many users at the same time, and then
> calmed down for long time, and came again.
> I found the query I used to log locks would miss locks that relname is null.
> will add that, though no idea why it's null
Thanks for the info. May miss something without such rows.
