Search Postgresql Archives

Re: ts_rank seems very slow (140 ranked documents / second on my machine)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 12 Jul 2011, Nicolas Grilly wrote:

On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 22:25, Oleg Bartunov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I don't see your query uses index :)

Yes, I know. :)

I ran VACUUM ANALYZE and re-ran the query but the output of EXPLAIN
ANALYZE stays exactly the same: no index used.

Any idea why?

there is problem with estimating of cost scanning gin index in < 9.1 versions,
so you can set enable_seqscan=off;
or try 9.1 which beta3 now.


By the way, does ts_rank is supposed to use a GIN index when it's available?

no, I see no benefit :)

	Regards,
		Oleg
_____________________________________________________________
Oleg Bartunov, Research Scientist, Head of AstroNet (www.astronet.ru),
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University, Russia
Internet: oleg@xxxxxxxxxx, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
phone: +007(495)939-16-83, +007(495)939-23-83

--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux