Search Postgresql Archives

Re: to_timestamp() and timestamp without time zone

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/23/2011 02:45 PM, David Johnston wrote:
...
As for "Time handling has lots of subtleties that take time to digest"; a
good programmer and API do their best to minimize the number of hidden
subtleties to be learned....

I meant that time-calculations themselves have lots of issues and subtleties.

The length of a day, month and a year are all varying periods of time leading to things like adding then subtracting a month does not return the original date:
select '2011-01-31'::date + '1 month'::interval - '1 month'::interval;
      ?column?
---------------------
 2011-01-28 00:00:00

The 30/360 accounting method takes care of this by simply assuming that every month has 30 days and there are 360 days in a year. There are plenty of shift-work systems and contracts that simply decree a shift to be 8-hours regardless if your shift is actually 7- or 9-hours due to DST changeover.

Since DST changes are not synchronized to a common point-in-time worldwide, one can easily attempt to scheduled synchronized early-morning jobs between East and West coast that will fail when the East changes DST several hours ahead of the West. Even tracking what rule to apply is tricky. Parts of Arizona observe daylight savings. Others do not. And while we're at it, what about those pesky leap-seconds?

Calculations for long prior dates/times have things like a few minute jump when (at least in the US) an interval crosses Sunday, November 18, 1883 ("the day of two noons"). And although October 1582 (Catholic regions) or September 1752 (Protestant regions/Unix-assumption) or later (Orthodox) are missing 10-days, PostgreSQL follows the SQL standard which does not show those dates as missing at all.

There is also an assumption that date calculations continue backward in history prior to the actual development of the concept of time-zones. And, lacking prescience, calculations for future dates assume that time-zone definitions won't change so the answer you get today may not be the answer you get if you run the same calculation tomorrow.

There are different definitions of when a year starts so be sure not to grab the wrong week-number or day-number - ISO and Julian are not the same.

And, of course, everything starts with the ethnocentric assumption of what calendar system to use. From my experience, there is not a lot of good SQL support for data using Islamic, Chinese, Hebrew, Hindu, Iranian, Coptic or Ethiopian calendars.

Until one considers which of the many issues inherent to date calculation may be important, one will not even know what assumptions to check for in the software being used.

Cheers,
Steve


--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux