Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Another RAID controller recommendation question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/18/2011 02:46 AM, David Boreham wrote:

We're looking to deploy a bunch of new machines.
Our DB is fairly small and write-intensive. Most of the disk
traffic is PG WAL. Historically we've avoided
RAID controllers for various reasons, but this new deployment will be
done with them (also for various reasons ;)

If the traffic is heavy on WAL, avoiding RAID controllers isn't a great practice. They're by far the best way possible to speed that up.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16816101339
manufacturer page :
http://www.supermicro.com/products/system/1U/6016/SYS-6016T-URF4_.cfm?UIO=N

This a solid basic server model. The Intel 5520 chipset they're built on is nice and fast if you load it up with a bunch of RAM.

these boxes have a proprietary controller slot, with these cards:
http://www.supermicro.com/products/nfo/UIO.cfm#Adapters
specifically this LSI-based one which seems to be the newest/fastest, with BBWBC:
http://www.supermicro.com/products/accessories/addon/AOC-USAS2LP-H8iR.cfm

I don't really like the whole proprietary controller slot thing if it can be avoided. We seem to have a lot of customers buying from Dell recently, and it's partly because they've made it pretty straightforward to swap out their PERC controller. That makes troubleshooting a broken server easier, spare parts are simple to manage, lots of advantages. You almost need to stock your own spares for things like the RAID cards if they're these propriety slot ones, because you're unlikely to find one in an emergency.

That said, the card itself looks like plain old simple LSI MegaRAID. Get the battery backup unit, check the battery and cache policy to make sure they're sane, and learn how to use megaci to monitor it. Fast and generally trouble free after that initial setup time investment.


These machines are operated in a lights-out mode, and
will handle heavy constant load (hundreds of write txn/s) with 15K SAS drives in a RAID-1 setup (2 drives, or 2 + 2 with data and WAL split between spindle groups).

If you can try to measure the exact ratio of database to WAL traffic here, that might help guide which of these configurations makes more sense. Hard to answer in a general way.

--
Greg Smith   2ndQuadrant US    greg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx   Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support  www.2ndQuadrant.us
"PostgreSQL 9.0 High Performance": http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/books


--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux