Search Postgresql Archives

Re: PostgreSQL 9.0 or 9.1 ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-general-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:pgsql-general-
> owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Grzegorz Jaskiewicz
> Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 11:05 AM
> To: Achilleas Mantzios
> Cc: pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re:  PostgreSQL 9.0 or 9.1 ?
> 
> It could be worth considering 9.1. Probably by the time you get
> production ready version, 9.1 will be already stable (few months I
> guess).
> The usual answer to that question is - it will be ready when its ready.
> 

I would also ask, what is your (and your managements) tolerance for risk, and do you actually need any of the new features and/or performance benefits in 9.1?

Postgres does have an excellent track record for quality and stability with new releases, but a couple of months in the field isn't really considered stable in most places.

Brad.

-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux