On Friday 06 May 2011 17:18:29 Tom Lane wrote:
Hi Tom,
> Possibly if
> you showed us the actual (not obfuscated) table declaration, associated
> constraint declarations, and resulting index definition, things would be
> clearer.
Thanks Tom, yes, the index is named
Indexes:
"concurrently" btree (ulq_guid)
In the 8.4 cluster and 9.0.4's pg_dumpall dumps it as
CREATE INDEX concurrently ON foo USING btree (ulq_guid);
That's it.
But shouldn't pg_upgrade be able to handle this?
Regards, Jens
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
