On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > That's interesting. An earlier replication system we had at Afilias > (erserver, which was descended from the rserv code that used to be in > contrib/) used this strategy.[1] > Oh... I remember erserver. It served us well for about 2 years for a simple, not very high-velocity database that was 99.44% read-only. I did have to monitor it closely and restart regularly. At least with slony I don't worry about it crashing out from under me... :) -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
