On 03/03/11 09:01, Jasmin Dizdarevic wrote: > hehe... > andrew, I appriciate pg and it's free open source features - maybe I've > chosen a wrong formulation. > in my eyes such a feature is getting more important nowadays. Why? Shared disk means shared point of failure, and poor redundancy against a variety of non-total failure conditions (data corruption, etc). Add the synchronization costs to the mix, and I don't see the appeal. I think clustering _in general_ is becoming a big issue, but I don't really see the appeal of shared-disk clustering personally. -- Craig Ringer -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
