Search Postgresql Archives

Re: [HACKERS] Large object corruption during 'piped' pg_restore

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Robert Haas <robertmhaas@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Bosco Rama <postgres@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> So I'm not sure whether to fix it, or leave it as a known failure case
>>> in old branches.  Comments?

>> As an end user there is one area of the DB that I want to work correctly
>> 100% of the time and that is the dump/restore tool(s).

> Yeah, I lean toward saying we should back-patch this.

Fair enough, I'll go do it.  I just wanted to hear at least one other
person opine that it was worth taking some risk for.

			regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux