Search Postgresql Archives

Re: help understanding collation order

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



raf <raf@xxxxxxx> writes:
> the behaviour i expect (and see on macosx-10.6.6) is:

>    id |     name      
>   ----+---------------
>     4 | CLARK
>     2 | CLARK, PETER
>     3 | CLARKE
>     1 | CLARKE, DAVID

> the behaviour i don't expect but see anyway (on debian-5.0) is:

>    id |     name      
>   ----+---------------
>     4 | CLARK
>     3 | CLARKE
>     1 | CLARKE, DAVID
>     2 | CLARK, PETER

> the "good" server has lc_messages='en_AU' and the
> "bad" server has lc_messages="en_AU.utf8" which may
> be relevant

No, not particularly.  Sort order is determined by lc_collate
not lc_messages.  Unfortunately it's entirely possible that OSX
will give you a different sort order than Linux even for similarly
named lc_collate settings.  About the only lc_collate setting that
really behaves the same everywhere, guaranteed, is "C" ... and that
might or might not do what you want.  (C locale does satisfy the
above example but it's hard to be sure what you want in general;
and if you are using any non-ASCII characters, C locale will more
than likely not be very satisfactory.)

			regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux