-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I'll use PG on a dedicated machine with more than 4GB of memory.
The problem is: what would be better to use: PAE ("bigmem" kernels) or
64-bit kernel?
PAE pro: half the memory per pointer, int, etc.
PAE risk: is PG able to take advantage of all the memory on PAE, esp. re
things like shared buffers?
64-bit pro: it's more mainstream now, no worries about shared bufs etc.
PAE overhead according to wikipedia should be small. (?)
So, which one should be better?
- --
Regards,
mk
- --
Premature optimization is the root of all fun.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNCJi2AAoJEFMgHzhQQ7hO05AH/jEr5hHlbqOh5MMdRR2GI3fM
EyJhA1dCH9hMgOEn0k07NzFLCZcwZRCVTTIPvgZPz/4pLjSG/37N/oacy8KX6tDo
8i9r8YM41wwlX2xeaowHqXybTFkRloRLN1Lb5cOzm5AadJn+F9+QjVf2r9MSrpGy
F/0pfWzR0Ams8HTbeW3GeB+vezEduRH8XUmuHs8DYx0q7KoeTAqyzFJwelU5R4vo
PCz8s/4A2t0A1wkRy4J+nVteORYjjdY3Yz44Df/3Tt1oVCbn9+fV979XjWwWiXXk
g9wq42/RI++gH8DBAx9iokBW8EKFb86GR4jlP4BxxO/glPhQv+bI1To9aPJwRm8=
=1gzy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
