On 12/08/2010 09:05 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Adrian Klaver<adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
On 12/08/2010 08:04 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
The rationale for having a limit of this sort is (a) we *don't* want
the upper limit of declarable length to be encoding-dependent; and
(b) if you are trying to declare an upper limit that's got more than a
few digits in it, you almost certainly ought to not be declaring a limit
at all.ion
Well that explains it :) Would it be possible to change the below
section in the docs to state that the declared max value of n is limited
to a max string size of 10Mb?
I don't really see any point in that. The value is meant to be an order
of magnitude or so more than anything that's sane according to point (b).
If you think you need to know what it is, you're already doing it wrong.
regards, tom lane
Well the determination of sanity is often in the eye of the beholder and
it would be nice to know where the line is. At any rate the answer is
the archives now, so I know where to get it.
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxx
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
