Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Do we want SYNONYMS?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/07/2010 10:45 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 08:31 -0500, Vick Khera wrote:
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Joshua D. Drake<jd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
Command Prompt is currently considering writing a patch to provide
synonyms to PostgreSQL. Is this something the community is interested
in? Do we have use cases for it? MSSQL, DB2 and Oracle support them.


I must be missing something, but really, what's the point of synonyms?
  What's the real-world use case for them?

For a PostgreSQL Person? I see no real benefit to be honest. For people
coming from Oracle, DB2 or MSSQL? I see a real benefit in terms of ease
of porting.

I asked on the Oracle free list[1] and Synonyms are used and used a lot
in Oracle. Anything we can do to help those folks run screaming from
err.... port to PostgreSQL seems like a good idea. (Assuming we can do
it reasonably)

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

If I am following this thread correctly the biggest issue to date is getting an apple to apple comparison. The confusion seems to be that what is proposed for SYNONYMS in Pg is not actually a synonym for SYNONYMS in Oracle.


--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@xxxxxxxxx

--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux