On tis, 2010-12-07 at 11:49 +0800, Craig Ringer wrote: > This is driving me nuts when working with PgJDBC via various ORM > layers (I know, I know, but they're life at this point) that would > work happily with these types if they were implicitly castable to/from > strings, but don't understand how to explicitly specify these > postgresql-specific types when talking to the JDBC layer. Since that is a quite specific use case, why don't you add the casts yourself? -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
