Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Do we want SYNONYMS?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Michael C Rosenstein <mcr@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> For example webAppUser sometimes needs to access the 
> public1.get_customer_name() function, the public1.order table and the 
> edit.account table. After a new data load of the public2 database, the 
> webAppUser would need to access the public2.get_customer_name() 
> function, the public2.order table and the edit.account table. By 
> switching the webAppUser's 'get_customer_name()' and 'account' synonyms, 
> this toggling between accessing public1 and public2 objects is quick, 
> easy and seamless.  The webAppUser code need only contain:
> select get_customer_name();
> or
> select * from order;
> without needing to be conscious of whether it is selecting from public1 
> or public2.

> Synonyms are a great feature in Oracle. The lack of synonyms in 
> PostgreSQL was one of our biggest hesitations in switching. As I said, 
> however, we found a hacky workaround by toggling the webAppUser's search 
> path.

[ shrug... ] Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, I guess.  To me the
search_path change seems like the natural way to do that, and flipping a
mess of synonyms the hack.  What happens when you miss one synonym?

			regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux