Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Does not use index on query using "field is null"?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 10:00:43 -0500
Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F8rn?= T Johansen <btj@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > I have a query that looks like this...:
> > select * from table where field is null
> 
> > And when I run explain, it tells me that it uses seq scan... Is this because pg thinks that seq scan is as fast as using indexes or because using index on "is null" queries does
> > not work?
> 
> What PG version?  Releases before 8.3 do not think that IS NULL is an
> indexable condition.
> 
> 			regards, tom lane
> 

We are using version 8.4.x...

BTJ

-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux