On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 11:24 PM, Sandeep Srinivasa <sss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > There was an interesting post today on highscalability > - http://highscalability.com/blog/2010/11/4/facebook-at-13-million-queries-per-second-recommends-minimiz.html > The discussion/comments touched upon why mysql is a better idea for Facebook > than Postgres. Here's an interesting one postgresql might not be a good fit for this type of application, but the reasoning given in the article is really suspicious. The true answer was hinted at in the comments: "we chose it first, and there was never a reason to change it". It really comes down to they probably don't need much from the database other than a distributed key value store, and they built a big software layer on top of that to manage it. Hm, I use facebook and I've seen tons of inconsistent answers, missing notifications and such. I wonder if there's a connection there... merlin -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
