On October 29, 2010, "Dean Gibson (DB Administrator)" <postgresql@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 2010-10-29 11:17, Alan Hodgson wrote: > > I'm curious about this too. It seems that currently I'd have to > > rebuild any additional slaves basically from scratch to use the new > > master. > > I think so long as you "pointed" (via primary_conninfo) the additional > slaves to the new (pending) master, before you "touch"ed the pending > master's trigger file, you should be OK, as all the DBs should be in > sync at that point. Yeah they're in sync data-wise, but do they think they're the same WAL stream for continuity? Would be nice. -- A hybrid Escalade is missing the point much in the same way that having a diet soda with your extra large pepperoni pizza is missing the point. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
