On 26 October 2010 22:01, Hfe80 <federico.mo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Some one know how to solve the problem of db that became huge from 700 Mbyte > to 16 Gbyte in 10 days and grow... > Vacuum doesn't solve the problem. > Only vacuum full is too invasive, the only way to reduce the DB is dump and > restore, but we cannot stop service... > > I know that a in a similar db where there is a lot of update the problem was > solved but I don't know how... > Some one Know this problem? > This article describes why you should almost never use vacuum full: http://it.toolbox.com/blogs/database-soup/getting-rid-of-vacuum-full-feedback-needed-33959 You need to vacuum more aggressively. -- Regards, Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general