A.M. wrote: > > On Oct 7, 2010, at 5:34 AM, Devrim G?ND?Z wrote: > > > On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 12:23 +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > >> This is really something that psycopg2 should work out for you. I > >> suggest you take up a discussion on this on their mailing list. > > > > ...which is down over the last 3 weeks or so: > > > > http://www.initd.org/ > > In addition, I posted a patch for 9.0 support which was supposed to be > rolled in to psycopg2 weeks ago. Now I am stuck pushing my own psycopg2 > egg around. The psycopg2 project is too reliant on one person (who has > trouble managing his servers)- I wish he would move the project to a > public project management service. > > I also remember a discussion on the poor state of postgresql drivers > for python and which driver the PostgreSQL project should endorse- it > looks like the situation has not improved. Here's the thread: > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-02/msg00351.php The python driver situation did improve, for a while. :-| -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@xxxxxxxxxx> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
