Search Postgresql Archives

Re: VACUUM FULL for performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Devrim GÃNDÃZ <devrim@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: VACUUM FULL for performance
From: Szymon Guz <mabewlun@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 15:33:38 +0200
Cc: AI Rumman <rummandba@xxxxxxxxx>, pgsql-general General <pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <1286452902.2426.19.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

2010/10/7 Devrim GÃNDÃZ <devrim@xxxxxxxxxx>

On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 17:38 +0600, AI Rumman wrote:
> MayVACUUM FULL on a table improve perfromance of the system?

No, it will make things worse.

That's not true, I'd rather say that it depends. The whole performance is not just about the vacuum full.

regards

Szymon

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: VACUUM FULL for performance
  - From: Bill Moran

References:
- VACUUM FULL for performance
  - From: AI Rumman
- Re: VACUUM FULL for performance
  - From: Devrim GÜNDÜZ

Prev by Date: Re: VACUUM FULL for performance
Next by Date: Re: VACUUM FULL for performance
Previous by thread: Re: VACUUM FULL for performance
Next by thread: Re: VACUUM FULL for performance
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Postgresql Jobs] [Postgresql Admin] [Postgresql Performance] [Linux Clusters] [PHP Home] [PHP on Windows] [Kernel Newbies] [PHP Classes] [PHP Books] [PHP Databases] [Postgresql & PHP] [Yosemite]

Powered by Linux