On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Mike Christensen <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> Yup that's exactly what I did.. I'm on 10.04, which doesn't have >> libuuid 1.6 in the software repository, go figure.. > > Oh ... we're in package-naming hell, is where we are. Poking around > some more on my Fedora 13 box, I find I have two different, similarly > named packages: > > $ rpm -qa | grep uuid > uuid-1.6.1-11.fc13.x86_64 > libuuid-2.17.2-8.fc13.x86_64 > uuid-devel-1.6.1-11.fc13.x86_64 > libuuid-devel-2.17.2-8.fc13.x86_64 > $ rpm -ql uuid-1.6.1-11.fc13.x86_64 > /usr/bin/uuid > /usr/lib64/libossp-uuid.so.16 > /usr/lib64/libossp-uuid.so.16.0.21 > ... and some doc files ... > $ rpm -ql libuuid-2.17.2-8.fc13.x86_64 > /lib64/libuuid.so.1 > /lib64/libuuid.so.1.3.0 > > The file you actually want, on Fedora (and, I bet, on Ubuntu), > is libossp-uuid.so.16. But apparently EDB's package was built on some > platform where uuid's library is installed as just "libuuid.so.16". > Maybe they used a homebuilt copy instead of an official platform > distribution? > > If you have a libossp-uuid.so.16, you might try symlinking libuuid.so.16 > to that instead of carrying a separate file. > > regards, tom lane > So now what you're saying is if it's not broke, fix it till it is :) -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
