Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Having two simultaneous and similar database

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Scott, Thanks to answering the question. Thats exactly the reason.

Also any operation on the tables is going to be huge. LIke 10s of
thousands of rows inserted of deleted. This basically locks the table
and that y we wanted to update a database and sync it with the
production database when no one will be using the system.



On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 9:55 PM, Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 8:46 PM, Rajesh Kumar Mallah
> <mallah.rajesh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Dear Sai,
>>
>> Why do you want to update at nite only. You can setup streaming replication
>> with pgsql9.0 and
>> have it updated almost instantly.
>
> They could have something where they need a stable unchanging version
> for testing, or they're load testing and need to write to the salve,
> etc.
>

-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux