Search Postgresql Archives

Re: pg_upgrade

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Brian Hirt wrote:
> Bruce,
> 
> The applied patch has the same behavior on i686 Ubuntu 10.04.   It
> looks like atol() is just a macro for strtol() in stdio.h.   I think
> you want strtoul() instead of strtol()

Yes, thanks.  I have now applied that fix in HEAD and 9.0.X.

> when i change str2uint() to use strtoul() pg_upgrade completes without
> a problem (I still haven't tested the upgrade database, but I expect
> that will be just fine).

Yep.

> I think it's pretty uncommon for the OID to be that big which is why
> nobody stumbled onto this.   This particular installation has pretty
> much been reloading development databases non stop for the last year.
> Also, people tend to initdb a lot when testing and doing development
> which will keep resetting the oid low.

Yes, seems > 2^31 oids are rarer than I thought.

--
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@xxxxxxxxxx>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +

-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux