Search Postgresql Archives

Re: zero_damaged_pages doesn't work

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



 On 9/27/2010 4:53 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
The reason it tells you that data will be destroyed is that that could
very well happen.  If the system decides to put new data into what will
appear to it to be an empty page, then the damaged data on disk will be
overwritten, and then there's no hope of recovering anything.

Like Jeff said, this is not a recovery tool.  It's certainly not meant
to be something that you keep turned on for any length of time, and so
the possibility of repeat messages is really not a design consideration
at all.

No argument with any of this, although I'm not the intended audience for
these warnings -- I know what I'm doing ;)

I'm not sure though if you're disagreeing with my
suggestion that the documentation be improved/corrected though.
Is that the case ? (if so then I will argue)




--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux