Jeff Davis <pgsql@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > There's no reason that there couldn't be a point <@ box operator in the > opclass, but nobody really uses these geometric types that come with > core postgres (at least, not that I can tell). Actually, as of 9.0 there is a point_ops opclass for GIST, with these indexable operators: >^(point,point) <<(point,point) >>(point,point) <^(point,point) ~=(point,point) <@(point,box) <@(point,polygon) <@(point,circle) I agree that for any more than light-duty geometric work, you ought to look at PostGIS. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general