Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Any plans to expose publicly (via stored proc) relation_needs_vacanalyze, or some flavour of do_autovacuum?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Vlad Romascanu <vromascanu@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> The logical, amended solution would then be to have the "writer"
> session perform, after INSERTion but before COMMITTing, the same
> calculation that the autovacuum daemon currently performs inside
> relation_needs_vacanalyze, based on the same configuration parameters
> that the autovacuum daemon uses, before deciding whether to explicitly
> ANALYZE or not the affected application tables.  Ideally one would not
> want to duplicate the relation_needs_vacanalyze logic (not to mention
> having to guess the value of last_anl_tuples, which is not exposed via
> any storedproc -- one would have to assume that it is more or less
> equivalent to pg_class.reltuples.)

I don't know if you actually looked at that code, but it's driven off of
statistics counters that are only updated at commit; and furthermore are
maintained in a different process altogether.  So what you have in mind
isn't going to work ...

			regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux