Search Postgresql Archives

Re: error while autovacuuming

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi All

Can I upgrade directly to postgres-8.4 . I think it would also be having
the fix for "autovacuum error" which is there in postgres-8.1.6 . But
please confirm .


Thanks..
Tamanna 

-----Original Message-----
From: tamanna madaan 
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 2:40 AM
To: 'Michael Glaesemann'; Scott Marlowe
Cc: pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE:  error while autovacuuming

Hi All

Thanks for your reply . 

Actually, I have a cluster setup with two nodes in it. I am having
postgres-8.1.2 and am using  slony-1.1.5 for replication between two
nodes in that cluster. Now,  If I plan to upgrade both the servers to
postgres-8.1.21, I will be doing it one by one . When one system is
upgraded to postgres-8.1.21 , other will still be on postgres-8.1.2
until its also upgraded. 
 
So I was just wondering if  there wont be any issue with replication
using slony-1.1.5 from postgres-8.1.2 to postgres-8.1.21 .

Second question : Will slony 1.1.5 work with postgres-8.1.21 or I'll
have to upgrade slony as well.

Is there any compatibility matrix between slony and postgres . where can
I find that ??


Please Reply ...

Thanks...
Tamanna 
  

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Glaesemann [mailto:grzm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 1:49 AM
To: Scott Marlowe
Cc: tamanna madaan; pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re:  error while autovacuuming


On Sep 8, 2010, at 16:15 , Scott Marlowe wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 1:11 PM, tamanna madaan
> <tamanna.madan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Hi All
>> 
>> Can a postgres patch for the fix ( provided in postgres-8.1.6 for
>> autovacuum error ) be included with the postgres version I am using
i.e
>> postgres 8.1.2 so that I don't have to upgrade to 8.1.21 ??
>> 
>> Please reply
> 
> If you look up the docs on diff and patch, you can easily make your
> own from the source code.  I'm not doing it, wanting to stay on a bug
> ridden release by applying a single patch is insane.

Not only that, but the to upgrade to 8.1.21 would require less work (and
the same downtime) as to apply the patch.

Michael Glaesemann
grzm seespotcode net




-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux