Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Interesting. I can't imagine how you could have produced these with >> plain COPY, since that would go through timestamptzin. Was it by any >> chance a binary COPY? If so I could believe that funny timestamps could >> get in. Maybe some confusion over endianness of the binary data, for >> instance. > Exactly, the code is using COPY ... TO STDOUT WITH BINARY along with > COPY ... FROM STDIN WITH BINARY. OK; what you need to look at is how the client code is preparing the timestamp values. What they should be is floats representing seconds since 2000-01-01 00:00 GMT, sent in bigendian byte order. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
