Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > 512M is still REALLY high for a 32 bit postgresql. Have you tried > something in the 16Meg range? Cutting his value for shared_buffers (currently about 800MB) might be wise too. I'm not sure what the effectively available address space for a win32 process is, but if there's any inefficiency in the way the address space is laid out, those numbers could be enough to be trouble. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
