On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 11:09 -0600, Bill Thoen wrote: > I'm building a national database of agricultural information and one > of the layers is a bit more than a gigabyte per state. That's 1-2 > million records per state, with a mult polygon geometry, and i've got > about 40 states worth of data. I trying to store everything in a > single PG table. What I'm concerned about is if I combine every state > into one big table then will performance will be terrible, even with > indexes? On the other hand, if I store the data in several smaller > files, then if a user zooms in on a multi-state region, I've got to > build or find a much more complicated way to query multiple files. > > So I'm wondering, should I be concerned with building a single > national size table (possibly 80-100 Gb) for all these records, or > should I keep the files smaller and hope there's something like > ogrtindex out there for PG tables? what do you all recommend in this > case? 80-100Gb isn't that much. However it may be worth looking into partitioning by state. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake -- PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579 Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering http://twitter.com/cmdpromptinc | http://identi.ca/commandprompt -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
