> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 4:05 AM, Davor J. <DavorJ@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > It seems no secret that a child table will not fire a trigger defined on > > it's parent table. Various posts comment on this. But nowhere could I > find a > > reason for this. > > Do you want your trigger that redirects insert on parent table to the > proper child table should run on child tables too? Well, inheritance is not used for partitioning ONLY. So, yes, for *my* use cases I would appreciate being able to tell triggers defined on parent tables to run on child tables when an insert/update/delete happens on a child table. (We use inheritance for auditing and for data aggregation.) But since I am not in a position to code the necessary infrastructure I won't complain about the status quo. Karsten wiki.gnumed.de -- GMX DSL: Internet-, Telefon- und Handy-Flat ab 19,99 EUR/mtl. Bis zu 150 EUR Startguthaben inklusive! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/dsl -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
