Search Postgresql Archives

Re: simple functions, huge overhead, no cache

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 04:38:48PM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> 2010/7/12 Josip Rodin <joy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 02:06:43PM +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
> >> Meh, personally I'll stick to the good old profiling methods "is it fast
> >> enough", "\timing", and "explain analyze".
> >
> > I agree. Some hint could be included in 'explain analyze' output, maybe just
> > to separate the timings for things that are well covered by the query plan
> > optimizer from those that aren't. I found this in a line like this:
> 
> it is useles for functions - explain doesn't show lines of executed
> functions. Can you show some example of some more complex query.

It doesn't have to show me any lines, but it could tell me which part of
the query is actually being optimized, and OTOH which part is simply being
executed N times unconditionally because it's a function that is marked as
volatile. That alone would be a reasonable improvement.

-- 
     2. That which causes joy or happiness.

-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux