Hi List,
With automated queries where I have COLUMN IN (), I get a different plan
from COLUMN = (). That would make sense if there are several arguments,
but in the case with just one argument the penalty can be seveare. One
query went from 5s execution time to a few houndreds of mS when I
changed IN to = if the number of arguments is 1.
Is there a technical reason for not treating IN with one argument as =
in that case?
pondDump=> explain analyze select
pic.objectid as pic_objectid
from
pond_item_common pic
where
pic.pond_user IN (select pu2.objectid from pond_user pu2 where
username_locase IN ('iceberger'))
limit 100;
QUERY
PLAN
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Limit (cost=15.41..396.89 rows=100 width=4) (actual time=0.047..0.061
rows=11 loops=1)
-> Nested Loop (cost=15.41..1400.19 rows=363 width=4) (actual
time=0.046..0.056 rows=11 loops=1)
-> HashAggregate (cost=8.28..8.29 rows=1 width=4) (actual
time=0.026..0.026 rows=1 loops=1)
-> Index Scan using pond_user_c2 on pond_user pu2
(cost=0.00..8.27 rows=1 width=4) (actual time=0.017..0.018 rows=1 loops=1)
Index Cond: ((username_locase)::text =
'iceberger'::text)
-> Bitmap Heap Scan on pond_item_common pic
(cost=7.13..1387.36 rows=363 width=8) (actual time=0.015..0.024 rows=11
loops=1)
Recheck Cond: (pic.pond_user = pu2.objectid)
-> Bitmap Index Scan on pond_item_common_x1
(cost=0.00..7.04 rows=363 width=0) (actual time=0.012..0.012 rows=11
loops=1)
Index Cond: (pic.pond_user = pu2.objectid)
Total runtime: 0.181 ms
(10 rows)
pondDump=> explain analyze
select
pic.objectid as pic_objectid
from
pond_item_common pic
where
pic.pond_user = (select pu2.objectid from pond_user pu2 where
username_locase IN ('iceberger'))
limit 100;
QUERY PLAN
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Limit (cost=15.41..395.88 rows=100 width=4) (actual time=0.043..0.055
rows=11 loops=1)
InitPlan 1 (returns $0)
-> Index Scan using pond_user_c2 on pond_user pu2
(cost=0.00..8.27 rows=1 width=4) (actual time=0.017..0.018 rows=1 loops=1)
Index Cond: ((username_locase)::text = 'iceberger'::text)
-> Bitmap Heap Scan on pond_item_common pic (cost=7.13..1388.27
rows=363 width=4) (actual time=0.042..0.053 rows=11 loops=1)
Recheck Cond: (pond_user = $0)
-> Bitmap Index Scan on pond_item_common_x1 (cost=0.00..7.04
rows=363 width=0) (actual time=0.038..0.038 rows=11 loops=1)
Index Cond: (pond_user = $0)
Total runtime: 0.096 ms
(9 rows)
pondDump=>
Best regards,
Marcus
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
