Miguel Vaz <pagongski@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I was looking for an opinion on the actual table structure. :-) How should i > build the data set? Is my second example ok? The first is the long version > but i wanted to put together all the common fields to both types of "sites" > and then (maybe) build tables to accomodate the specific fields so there are > no empty columns on the table if i put everything in the same table. > [...] That's way too fuzzy for good advice. Few people build data sets on archaeological sites, and even those probably don't use all the same structure. Tim (not telepathic) -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
