Search Postgresql Archives

Re: 'default nextval()' loses schema-qualification in dump ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/07/10 07:47, Arnaud Lesauvage wrote:
Le 6/07/2010 17:17, Tom Lane a écrit :
Arnaud Lesauvage<arnaud.listes@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
As you have understood, I am not very savvy about postgresql's
internals, but from what you say my guess is that the problem is int the
psqlODBC is getting the default value of the sequence ?

[9.125]conn=095C4198, query='select n.nspname, c.relname, a.attname,
a.atttypid, t.typname, a.attnum, a.attlen, a.atttypmod, a.attnotnull,
c.relhasrules, c.relkind, c.oid, d.adsrc, case t.typtype when 'd' then
t.typbasetype else 0 end, t.typtypmod from (((pg_catalog.pg_class c
inner join pg_catalog.pg_namespace n on n.oid = c.relnamespace and
c.relname = E'mytable' and n.nspname = E'myschema') inner join
pg_catalog.pg_attribute a on (not a.attisdropped) and a.attnum > 0 and
a.attrelid = c.oid) inner join pg_catalog.pg_type t on t.oid =
a.atttypid) left outer join pg_attrdef d on a.atthasdef and d.adrelid =
a.attrelid and d.adnum = a.attnum order by n.nspname, c.relname, attnum'

This is psqlODBC getting the sequence name (if you run this query it's the adsrc column). If I remember correctly, that's supposed to be the human-readable version of an expression and preserved *as entered by the user* (or pg_restore in your case).

If you start psql with the "-E" option and do \d myschema.mytable you'll be able to see how it gets the sequence-name. About half-way down the list of queries it runs you'll see a reference to pg_get_expr(...) - that turns an internal representation into a useful usable one.

I don't know why psqlODBC isn't using that. The function has been around for a while. Hmm - it's present back in 7.4 although it's not used in \d - that does reference adsrc directly.

Just grabbed the source download for the latest version and it still looks like it's using adsrc (I just searched for that and pg_get_expr). There should probably be a change in info.c around line 2091 to add a check for a recent version of PG (8+) and use pg_get_expr. Check on the odbc mailing-list - there may be an updated version available for you to test.

--
  Richard Huxton
  Archonet Ltd

--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux