2010/6/27 Joshua D. Drake <jdrake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > On 6/26/2010 1:25 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote: >> >> Hello >> >> 2010/6/26<wei725@xxxxxxxxx>: >> >>> >>> About four five years ago, I had received a few of emails about the data >>> type problems on this mailing list. I believe that the problem was about a >>> performance issue. Is any problem withe the Long Integer type in the late >>> releases? >>> >> >> There is no reason why Long can be slower. Maybe you are thinking >> Numeric data type. >> > > Actually as I understand it, if they are running 32bit it is theorectically > slower. aha - I undestand now. It could be - but from 8.3 the overhead is relative small. Regards Pavel Stehule > > JD > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general > -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
